A running theme in the many tributes paid to industrialist Ratan Tata has been the recognition of his record as a philanthropist and his humane personality. Evidence normally cited of the former is the record of the Tata Trusts and of the latter is his care of stray dogs. Philanthropy is typically more institutional and the expression of social commitment. Charity or concern for the underdog, so to speak, is more personal and emotional. Ratan Tata was known for both. Indeed, the Tata Group has set a benchmark of sorts for the social commitment of Indian business.
It must be pointed out, though, that a philanthropist is not necessarily a charitable and humane individual. The philanthropy of most Indian businesses and businesspersons is nothing more than a means of tax avoidance or adherence to the provisions in company law relating to corporate social responsibility (CSR). Charity, on the other hand, is a more heartfelt response to social inequity and individual need. Ratan Tata expressed his social commitment both institutionally and personally.
Welcome to Civil Society's
new website!
Login to Civil Society by entering your email below
A running theme in the many tributes paid to industrialist Ratan Tata has been the recognition of his record as a philanthropist and his humane personality. Evidence normally cited of the former is the record of the Tata Trusts and of the latter is his care of stray dogs. Philanthropy is typically more institutional and the expression of social commitment. Charity or concern for the underdog, so to speak, is more personal and emotional. Ratan Tata was known for both. Indeed, the Tata Group has set a benchmark of sorts for the social commitment of Indian business.